Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Outreach

Backlink Sites

Most 'backlink sites' you find on forums are a waste of time. I should know — I wasted months on them before realising the only link that matters is the one you didn't ask for.

Beginner5 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

Start here

  • Audit your current backlink profile before chasing new sites.
  • Identify competitor backlinks to find proven opportunities.
  • Create linkable assets like original research or tools.
  • Prioritise relevance and authority over sheer volume.
  • Avoid directories and link exchanges that offer no real value.

Plain-English take

Think of backlink sites as recommendations, but not all recommendations carry weight. A link from a well-read blog in your niche tells search engines "this site is credible." But a link from a spammy directory is like a stranger shouting on a street corner – nobody listens. I have a rule: if a site would not naturally link to you without being asked, it probably should not be a priority. For example, I once earned a link from a niche hobbyist blog with a [Domain Authority](/domain-authority/) of 35. That link drove 200 referral visits in the first month and a noticeable bump in rankings for a specific keyword. The same week, a link from a DA 70 business directory – a classic "backlink site" – sent zero visitors and did nothing for my rankings. The difference was editorial context. The hobbyist blog wrote a genuine review of my tool; the directory just listed URLs. That taught me to chase links that come with an audience, not just a metric. When evaluating a potential backlink site, I ask: does this site have regular readers? Do they engage in comments? Is the link placed within natural content? If the answer to any is no, I move on. This focus has saved me time and kept my link profile clean.

When it actually matters

Backlink sites become important when you operate in a competitive niche. If your competitors already have strong links from industry publications and resource pages, you need similar endorsements to stay visible. But there is a counter-argument: you might think any high-authority link will do. I have seen cases where a nofollow link from a top-tier news site (e.g., a mention in a sponsored article) carried less SEO value than a follow link from a niche forum where the link was given editorially. The context of the link – the surrounding content, the [anchor text](/anchor-text/), the editorial policy – matters more than Domain Authority alone. Another situation where backlink sites matter is when building brand authority for a long-term project. A single mention on a respected site can lead to further opportunities: journalists see it, other blogs reference it, and your site becomes a known resource. For example, after I was cited on an industry round-up, I received three unsolicited guest post requests within two months. That one link acted as a signal to other editors. The edge case is local businesses: a backlink from your local chamber of commerce or a community news site often outperforms a generic national link because relevance and local trust are strong signals. I now prioritise sites that are relevant to my specific topic, not just high in authority. This is a core part of [off-page SEO](/off-page-seo/) that too many people overlook.

What I got wrong

I used to believe all backlinks were good links. Early in my career, I spent hours submitting to directories and exchanging links with anyone who would reciprocate. The result was a messy [backlink profile](/backlink-profile/) full of unrelated, low-quality links that provided no traffic and, in some cases, may have flagged my site for unnatural patterns. I changed my mind about quantity too. I once celebrated building 500 links in a month from article directories and forum signatures. My rankings did not move. When I eventually cleaned that profile and replaced those 500 links with 10 [editorial links](/editorial-links/) from relevant blogs, I saw a real change in organic traffic. That is when I understood that one strong link beats a hundred weak ones every time. My biggest admission: I thought guest posting was the ultimate strategy. Now I see it as one of many tactics, and often overused. If you guest post on a site that accepts every submission, the link is cheap and the audience is gone. I wasted months pitching "write for us" pages that produced links with no referral traffic. I would now rather spend that time on [digital PR](/digital-pr/) or creating a data study that journalists pick up naturally. That shift has made my link building more efficient and less dependent on chasing backlink sites.

Next step

Quick answers

Are backlink directories still useful for SEO?

Not really. Most directories offer little value because search engines devalue them. I would only consider niche, curated directories that require editorial approval. Even then, one good editorial link outweighs ten directory links. Focus on earning links from sites with real readers instead.

How many backlinks do I need to rank?

There is no fixed number. In competitive niches you might need hundreds of strong editorial links; in low-competition areas, a handful can work. I prioritise relevance and authority over count. A single link from a top industry site can be more effective than 50 links from irrelevant blogs.

Should I buy links from sites that sell backlinks?

I advise against it. Buying links violates Google's guidelines and carries risk of a manual penalty. I have seen sites hit hard for paid links. If you must, only consider placements that are clearly marked as sponsored and that come from high-authority, relevant sites. Even then, the ROI is uncertain.

Sources

Primary documentation is linked directly. Anything commercial is marked nofollow.

Notes from Callum Bennett.