Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Start here

SEO 6 Way

I used to think SEO was just content and links, but I now split it into six areas that I tackle in a specific order to avoid wasting time.

Beginner3 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

What I’d do first

  • Confirm your pages are crawlable and indexable before doing anything else.
  • Map each page to a specific search intent and write to answer that query directly.
  • Optimise title tags, meta descriptions and headings for clarity, not just keywords.
  • Measure performance in Search Console and prioritise fixes based on impact on clicks.

The path I'd take

I structure my SEO work using a six-way checklist: crawlability, search intent, on-page content, on-page markup, technical performance and authority signals. I work through them in that order because each layer depends on the one before.

First, I confirm crawlability. I open [Google Search Console](/google-search/) and check the coverage report for errors. If a page that matters is not indexed, I fix the cause — often a blocked robots.txt or a misconfigured canonical. I also submit a [sitemap](/seo-checklist/) to speed up discovery. I make sure the page returns a 200 status and is not stuck in a redirect chain. I once found a client's key landing page had three redirect hops; after cleaning it up, impressions doubled in a week.

Second, I define search intent. For each page, I write the exact query I want it to rank for and decide whether the user wants to buy, learn, compare or navigate. I check the current top results to see what format they use: a listicle, a product page, a video. I match that format.

Third, I build content around that intent. I keep the page focused on answering the query, not on covering tangents. I group related ideas under descriptive headings. I avoid fluff paragraphs.

Fourth, I optimise on-page elements. I write one clear title tag that includes the target phrase naturally. I write a meta description that summarises the page's value. I use one H1 that matches the page's core topic. I add structured data for the content type — I use [Article schema](/semantic-search/) for blog posts or Product schema for shops.

Fifth, I check technical performance: load speed, mobile-friendliness, Core Web Vitals, HTTPS, and intrusive interstitials. I use PageSpeed Insights and look at the field data, not just lab data.

Finally, I work on authority. I only build links after the page is useful and accessible. I focus on earning links through outreach to relevant sites, not mass directory submissions.

I measure everything with Search Console and adjust based on click-through rate and average position.

Watch-outs

The biggest watch-out is treating SEO as a one-time setup. I revisit each of the six areas every quarter because search behaviour and Google's criteria change. Another watch-out is copying a competitor's on-page strategy without understanding their domain authority. They might rank with thin content because of strong links; I cannot replicate that. I instead focus on making my page more thorough.

Avoid over-optimising title tags. I see a lot of "Cheap Widgets | Buy Cheap Widgets | Widgets for Sale" — that looks like spam. I prefer a title that describes the page accurately: "Widgets – Affordable, Durable, and In Stock | Brand Name". Similarly, meta descriptions should be written for click-through, not keyword density.

Do not ignore user experience. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, but more importantly, users bounce from slow or cluttered pages. If my page loads in three seconds but shows a pop-up covering the content, I lose the visitor. I test on a mobile device with 3G throttling.

Do not rely solely on average position in Search Console. That metric averages impressions across many queries. A page might have a high average position for rare queries and a low position for the one that matters. I look at individual query data.

Edge case: if I am launching a brand new site, I cannot compete on head terms immediately. I pick long-tail queries with clear intent and build content around them. I also ensure the site is technically sound from day one.

Another watch-out: ignoring internal link structure. I link between related pages to pass authority and help users navigate. I use descriptive anchor text but not too many exact-match links. I follow [SEO best practices](/seo-best-practices/) for internal linking density.

What I got wrong

I made several mistakes over the years. The first was believing that content quality alone would guarantee rankings. I spent months writing thorough guides but never checked if the pages were indexable. One site had a noindex tag on the whole blog because of a theme setting. That taught me to always verify crawlability before content.

I also got wrong the role of link building. Early in my career, I thought it was a numbers game. I bought cheap links from link farms and submitted to directories. That resulted in a manual action. I lost months recovering. Now I focus on earning links by creating genuinely useful assets and promoting them through outreach. I also realise that internal linking and on-page authority signals matter more than external link count for many queries.

I underestimated the impact of page speed. I had a site that ranked well for a high-value term but lost traffic after a Core Web Vitals update. I fixed the CLS issue caused by a dynamic ad insertion script, and organic traffic increased by 15% within two months. That changed how I prioritise technical debt.

I also used to stuff keywords into headings and alt text. I thought that was on-page optimisation. After reading Google's guidance on user-focused content, I changed to natural, descriptive language. My click-through rates improved because my titles and headings actually matched what users wanted.

Finally, I used to ignore search intent. I wrote a comparison page for a transactional keyword, but I used a long-form guide format. The bounce rate was high. I restructured it as a comparison table with concise pros and cons, and conversions doubled.

In short, I now see [SEO](/seo/) as a system of interdependent parts. Ignoring one area weakens the whole. I change my mind on something new every year.

Next step

Quick answers

What is the most overlooked area of SEO?

Typically crawlability. Many sites I audit have important pages blocked by robots.txt or stuck in redirect chains. Fixing that often produces the biggest immediate gain in indexed pages and organic traffic.

Should I focus on content or technical SEO first?

Technical first. If a page cannot be crawled or indexed, no amount of good content will matter. I once spent weeks rewriting articles only to find they were blocked by a noindex tag. Fix technical issues before investing in content.

How do I decide which SEO tactic to invest in?

Start with the issue costing you the most impressions. If pages are indexed but not clicking, work on titles and meta descriptions. If they are not indexed, fix crawl problems. If you have good content but few links, focus on outreach.

Sources

Primary documentation is linked directly. Anything commercial is marked nofollow.

Notes from Callum Bennett.