Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Tool lab

Tools Seobook

I used to rely on SEOBook's keyword density tool until I realised it was leading me to over-optimise content that Google never cared about.

Beginner3 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

The short verdict

  • Use the page comparison tool to spot missing meta descriptions and phrase gaps in competitor pages.
  • Treat the keyword density number only as a flag for over-optimisation; never as a ranking target.
  • Skip the rank checker entirely; modern SERPs are personalised and dynamic, so use Google Search Console or a dedicated rank tracker.
  • Pair SEOBook tools with a technical crawler like Screaming Frog to cover on-page and site structure together.

What it's good at

Quick keyword discovery – paste a URL or a topic and within seconds you get a list of related terms. I tested a page about 'vegan protein powder' and got 50 long-tail suggestions in under three seconds. That speed beats opening a full suite like [Ahrefs](/ahrefs/) for a quick brainstorm when you just need ideas to expand a cluster.

Page comparison – this is the feature I use most. Enter two URLs and it shows their titles, meta descriptions, and common two- and three-word phrases side by side. I ran a comparison between my client's landing page and a competitor's. The competitor had 'free shipping' in their meta description while my client didn't. That took two seconds to spot. I now open the tool before writing any new page to see what the ranking page covers that mine misses.

Keyword density checker – I've stopped treating this as a target, but I still use it as a rough sanity check. If I'm writing about 'best running shoes' and the density hits 8%, I know the text is stuffed. I rewrite until it sits around 2–3%. The number itself means nothing to Google, but it flags when I've gone overboard.

Lightweight and fast – no registration, no installation, no account needed. I can pull it up on a client's laptop during a meeting and run a check without logging in. The spartan interface is actually a relief after the bloated dashboards of commercial tools.

What it's awkward for

Keyword density as a ranking factor – this is the mistake I made early in my career. I optimised a page to hit 5% density for 'plumber London' and watched the page drop from position 6 to 12. Google doesn't calculate density. The tool shows a text-analysis metric, not a ranking signal. I now use it only to catch accidental stuffing, never as an optimisation target. If you see a guide telling you to hit a specific percentage, ignore it.

Modern rank tracking – the old Rank Checker was a Firefox extension that hasn't been updated in years. SERPs are personalised, location-based, and dynamic. I tried running it for a London-based client and got different results on three consecutive runs. You cannot make campaign decisions on that data. Use a dedicated [rank tracker](/rank-tracker/) or, even better, rely on Google Search Console's first-party impression data.

All-in-one SEO – SEOBook is a collection of utilities, not a platform. There is no backlink analysis, no site audit, no crawl visualisation. I once tried to piece together a full workflow using just these tools and ended up with five tabs open, manually cross-referencing data. It's not efficient. For technical audits you need something like [Screaming Frog](/screaming-frog/), and for competitive backlink research you need a subscription tool.

Surface-level data – the page comparison shows common phrases but gives no search volume, trend, or competition metrics. I compared two pages and saw they both used 'organic cotton', but I had no idea whether that term had any search demand. You need a keyword research tool to go deeper.

Alternatives I'd consider

Ahrefs for keyword research and backlink analysis. It's paid but I consider it the best value for serious work. I use the Content Gap feature to find terms that competitors rank for that I don't. SEOBook's page comparison is a free, lightweight version of that – but it lacks volume data and backlink profiles. If you do monthly SEO work, budget for Ahrefs.

Semrush for competitive research and PPC data. I've used it to reverse-engineer a competitor's paid ad strategy. The domain overview report is faster than digging through SEOBook's tools. For organic work I still prefer Ahrefs, but Semrush wins for advertising intel.

Google Search Console – non-negotiable and free. It shows exactly what Google crawls, indexes, and ranks for your site. I check impressions and clicks before I open any third-party tool. SEOBook cannot replace first-party data.

Keywords Everywhere browser extension – cheap and integrates where I browse. I see search volume, CPC, and trend data right in the SERP. For under ten dollars, it's a better complement to SEOBook than buying another suite.

Moz for domain authority and spam score. I don't love the metric, but clients expect it. SEOBook doesn't offer any domain-level authority signal. If you need to report a benchmark, [Moz](/moz/) gives you something consistent across industries.

Screaming Frog for technical crawls. SEOBook has no crawler. I run Screaming Frog to find broken links, duplicate titles, and missing alt text. The two tools work well together: SEOBook for quick content checks, Screaming Frog for site structure.

Next step

Quick answers

Does SEOBook still update its tools regularly?

The tools page remains accessible and functional, but development appears slow. The rank checker extension hasn't seen an update in years. For actively maintained free tools, consider Ubersuggest or the Google Trends API instead.

Can I rely on SEOBook for thorough competitive analysis?

The page comparison tool gives a useful starting point for identifying meta and phrase gaps, but it lacks search volume, trend data, and backlink profiles. Pair it with a tool like Ahrefs or Semrush to get the complete picture before acting.

Is the keyword density checker completely useless then?

No, it serves one purpose well: catching accidental over-optimisation. If a primary keyword appears more than 5% of the time, I rewrite. But never try to hit a specific density. Use it as a guardrail, not a target.

Sources

Primary documentation is linked directly. Anything commercial is marked nofollow.

  • SEOBook tools page — Primary source confirming the existence and basic functions of the keyword tools, page comparison, and density checker.
  • SEOBook Keyword Density Analyzer video — Demonstrates the keyword density analyzer in use, showing how the tool works and what data it returns.
  • Google Search Central — Authoritative guidance that keyword density is not a ranking factor, supporting my dismissal of it as a target.
  • Moz Beginner's Guide to SEO — Provides core SEO concepts like keyword research and on-page optimisation, which help contextualise SEOBook's role.

Notes from Callum Bennett.